Saturday, May 17, 2008, 5:51PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Laura Rowley Money & Happiness

Laura Rowley, Money & Happiness

Can You Live On One Income? It’s Worth a Try

by Laura Rowley

Very Good (504 Ratings)
3.890878/5
Posted on Wednesday, May 7, 2008, 12:00AM

Is it possible for families to go from two incomes to one?

It's something most households with two working parents and young children at home have contemplated at some point. More than 60 percent of families with children under age 18 had both parents employed outside the home in 2005-2006, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That compares to less than a third of mothers in 1975.

Driven to the Edge

You see lots of articles discussing ways to eliminate the second income -- things like clipping coupons, buying second-hand clothes, and cutting out vacations and cable television.

But ultimately, paring those expenses isn't going to cover the gap for most middle-class families, because those aren't the costs that drive them to the economic edge. The real problems are what Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren calls "the big five" -- housing, health insurance, child care, a second automobile, and taxes.

Warren, author of "The Two-Income Trap," is an expert on family bankruptcy. She has found that married couples with children are more than twice as likely to file for bankruptcy as childless couples. (More children live in homes that will file for bankruptcy this year than live in homes that will file for divorce.)

Moreover, income volatility has increased sharply among families with children. According to Jacob Hacker, author of "The Great Risk Shift," the volatility in family incomes doubled between 1969 and 2004. Moreover, Americans with at least four years of college experienced a larger increase in family income instability than those with only a high school education over the past generation, with most of the rise occurring in the last 15 years. 

More Is Less

The single-income family with two children in the early 1970s earned about $32,000 in inflation-adjusted dollars, compared to $73,000 for the dual-income family in the early 2000s.

Despite the higher income, today's families save less and carry more debt: In 1970, the one-income family saved 11 percent of its take-home pay and allocated 1.4 percent of its annual income to pay revolving debt, such as credit cards. In 2005, the two-income family saved nothing, and allocated 15 percent of its annual income to revolving debt, according to Warren.

In other words, the two-income family spends everything -- the second income, all of its annual savings -- and has piled on debt. Where does the money go? Despite the sticker-shock that goes with buying a gallon of milk these days, they didn't spend it on food, clothing, appliances, electronics, or automobiles -- on an inflation-adjusted basis, those costs actually went down.

The Big Five

Warren found two-earner families today spend three-quarters of their household incomes on five categories (which consumed only half the income of single-earner families a generation ago):

Housing: The cost for families with children has risen 100 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1970.

Health Insurance: For a healthy family that has an employer-sponsored insurance plan, costs have risen 74 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1970. In that year, the demographic group most likely to lack health insurance was a 23-year-old unmarried man with no children; today it's a person age 35 who is married with children.

Cars: Families today spend 52 percent more on automobiles than in 1970, on an inflation-adjusted basis, Warren found. While the inflation-adjusted price of automobiles has dropped since 1970, families are still spending more on this category because they typically need two cars to get to work.

Taxes: The first dollar that the second earner earns is taxed after the last dollar of the first earner, Warren notes. This means that the tax rate for the family unit has risen by about 25 percent between 1970 and today.

Child Care: In 2007, fees in licensed centers ranged from $10,920 a year for 4-year-old children to $14,647 a year for infants, according to a study by the National Association of Child Care Resources and Referral Agencies (NACCRRA). In every region of the United States, annual costs of child care surpass the cost of food.

Reading, Writing, and Retirement

A sixth major expense is education -- both preschool and college -- which most families in 1970 didn't view as necessary to launch their child into the middle class.

The number of children who attend preschool has risen to 45 percent of all 3- and 4-year-olds from about 20 percent in 1970, according to the Census Bureau. On average, parents pay $7,000 a year, according to NACCRRA.

Finally, there's the challenge of saving for retirement. In the late 1970s, 62 percent of workers were covered solely by defined benefit plans, paid for by their employers; in 2005, the number was 10 percent, according to data from the Employee Benefits Research Institute.

Making It on One Income

So is it possible to downscale to one income? It may be, for couples who are willing to make bold changes with their money and in their attitudes, says Judy Lawrence, a financial coach and author of "The Budget Kit."

"You have to be willing to do some soul-searching about the things you're going to change and let go of," Lawrence says, adding that the stay-at-home parent takes on the additional job of planning ahead and investing the time to get the best deal. It's going back to your true priorities, values and goals and saying 'it's the best choice for me, my family, and our future' -- not 'we'll be locked into a life of drudgery and we can't do what we want to do.'"

Jonni McCoy, a Colorado writer and founder of Miserly Moms, agrees. When she left her job as a buyer for Apple Computer in 1992 to stay home with her two children, she was earning more than half the family income. "Make sure you're really clear why you are doing it, because there will be days when this is the last thing on the planet you want to do," she says, drawing an analogy to nutrition: "The average diet lasts 72 hours, but if you have a medical reason, it will stick."

The Single Life

Find a community of like-minded savers, says McCoy. "You have to have people who share your values, who say 'no, I can't afford that,' " she says. "The beginning is so tough, because when you're leaving the working world you may not have that community established."

Bankrate.com offers a calculator to help figure out what a second income is really worth on an after-tax basis, without all the work-related expenses. You need to track your monthly expenses for child care, commuting, work clothes, lunches and coffee breaks, dry cleaning, cash for coworkers' birthdays and other celebrations, and money spent on take-out meals and restaurants because you don't have time to shop and cook. Also consider savings on cleaning and other services the stay-at-home partner could take on, and the possibility of eliminating or downsizing a second car.

Start to tackle grocery expenses before you quit. "Food is the largest unfixed expense in most household budgets, so there's a tremendous amount of money in there," says McCoy. "We tweaked our budget in every way, but the majority of extra money came out of groceries." Basing weekly menus specifically on sale items can cut 30 percent off a grocery bill, McCoy says.

Getting to No

Lawrence, whose budgeting guide was first published in the 1980s, says it's harder to live on one income today because a number of innovations -- such as Internet access and certain prescription drugs -- have become necessities. But just as important, there's so much more choice in luxuries than there used to be -- that is, so much more stuff to say "no" to.

"Children and adults are bombarded unconsciously with media showing them how life is supposed to be; you're unconsciously saying 'no, no, no' all the time -- and that takes energy," Lawrence says. "It's much more of an emotional challenge than it used to be."

Rate This story

Very Good (504 Ratings)
4/5
Sign-in to rate!

194 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 194Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, May 16, 2008, 3:18AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    From the get-go and the title itself, the article is tilted/biased towards the one-income lifestyle and thus giving an impression that the one-income is better or should be preferred over the dual-income household. Everyone has their own views on this but I think one of the root questions is "Is there even any evidence proving that a one-income household is a better household or will provide better kids with greater values and more successful lives when they grow up than a dual-income household?" I've known people who have good values and are successful that came from dual-incomes and some people that are the opposite that came from single-income households. Even if there were a research study that shows otherwise, statistics doesn't really prove anything much because every household has different situations and is different from each other. It all comes down to how responsible and accountable the parents are with their own kids even if both parents have careers outside of home. Dual-incomes are not only present here in the U.S. Even in other countries, developed or third-worlds, there are lots of dual-income households. Some maybe due to survival or a lifestyle choice, but their reasons behind their choices to have single or dual-incomes are not much different from the households here in the U.S. It's not always because of material luxury as the last two paragraphs with a sub-heading of "Getting to No" in the article imply. Sorry Laura, but this article indeed has not a lot of meaningful meat in it and is making inaccurate assumptions without addressing the real reasons and life situations behind the single and dual-income household issue.

  • jdh43614 - Thursday, May 15, 2008, 2:23AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    You can live on on income if it is high enough. If it is high enough, that is the point. One or two or three, who cares? As long as you have enough money to buy the things that make live worth living. If I could not buy the things I want (and I did have that period in my life) I would feel worthless. Just seeing other people enjoying things I want but can't have is VERY PAINFUL. So, make enough money to get what you want and you will be happy. What could be simpler? Yet so many can't understand, and try to reduce their "wants" instead of just getting more money and buying stuff.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, May 14, 2008, 9:57PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I am a stay at home mom and my husband makes under $60,000. We are making it just fine. My children went to and one still goes to a private school from K-8 and one is now in high school. They are both straight A students. We eat very healthy meals and snacks that I prepare everyday. They both have the clothes they need and have a very comfortable life. They are strong and active in sports, and very hard workers in all that they do. My husband and kids like having a stay-at-home mom and wife. We are all very fit and active. Lazy is not a word that would fit in our household. Remember, just because you work outside the home doesn't make you exempt from the word LAZY! We have two new cars and a house that is almost paid for. We are in our early 40's. We were given nothing by anyone. When they are 18, if I want to pursue an education or get a job I will do so then. Most importantly, I will do so with a very clear conscience. My goal is too be here for them now. NO REGRETS. We spend time together after school and have a lot of deep discussions on social issues that come up in their daily lives. They are very respected by their teachers. I have no doubt in my mind that they will succeed in all that they do and pursue in life. Some parents are so busy working that they don't have a clue what their materialistic spoiled kids are doing behind their backs. Most kids seem to be lacking parental attention and guidance and then look for it in other ways. NOT GOOD! Open your eyes parents. Remember your degree didn't make you street smart or parent smart. I hope you really are thinking about your kids and not your BMW's and flat screen televisions. Good luck to all out there.

  • mediaspectator - Wednesday, May 14, 2008, 8:18PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    I often enjoy reading the comments of others, but never post one myself. I read a post down from here, that refers to a post made at 6:44pm. Out of curiosity I went to that post made at 6:44pm to read it, and was appalled. I work while my wife stays at home with our 3 kids, one of which has special needs. My wife works hard. To make a statement that stay at home moms are lazy, is ignorant. I didn't go to college, I make a decent income by most peoples standards, and we still live quite comfortably in a nice suburb of Seattle. We prefer to instill our values into our children, not the values of a babysitter, or daycare. We also find that our children are much more behaved then those of two working parents. I don't teach my children that they have to make a lot of money and go to college to be successful. I teach them to love GOD, and live by his Word. Our treasure lies in Heaven, not here on earth. That poster is sure entitled to their opinion, but one day they'll learn how misguided it is.

  • hobssleeps - Wednesday, May 14, 2008, 4:43PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    As for the article, I was hoping for a bit more meat. A bit generic and things already talked about for the last 20 years. Perhaps an idea would be to add in percentages of what income could make it and what wouldnt to current expenses. That would be interesting. As for the wierdo's out there that think two incomes are better than being there for your child in the first few years (and your actual parents), were in for trouble. Sorry, one more thing. The millionaires I know didnt go to Harvard, but the ones I know that went to Harvard are the brown nosers trying to work up the ladder of dulldrum.

Showing comments 1-5 of 194Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

More From Laura Rowley

Money & Happiness

Discover the secrets to financial happiness. Laura's book offers practical tools and positive strategies to create "the good life" in a meaningful way.

More about Money & Happiness

Learn to identify your values, banish debt, start saving, and investing; plus Laura's favorite online resources.

Order your copy of Money & Happiness today and boost your financial well-being!

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Sponsored Links

Learn Online Currency Trading
Discover Currency Trading with a Free starter kit from GFT. Try Now.
www.GFTforex.com
Countrywide® Home Loans
No Closing Cost Refi. No Points. No Credit Report or Processing Fees.
www.Countrywide.com
CFO Online
Find News and Insight For Financial Executives From CFO Magazine.
www.CFO.com
Invest In Oil & Gas Wells: personal finance
Proven US Oil Fields, Fast ROI, Tax Break, 25k Investment, Info Kit..
www.usoilenergy.com
Tesco Personal Finance Application
Every Job. Everywhere.
www.JobsOnline.net
Personal Finance?
Get Out of Debt and Start Saving! Free Debt Help To Reduce Payments.
DebtCurer.com/personalfinance